Comparison of ketosis, clinical mastitis, somatic cell count, and reproductive performance between free stall and tie stall barns in Norwegian dairy herds with automatic feeding

Acta Vet Scand. 1997;38(2):181-92. doi: 10.1186/BF03548498.

Abstract

Differences in ketosis and clinical mastitis rates, mean somatic cell counts (SCC) and reproductive performance scores (fertility status index = FS-index) between herds housed in free stall (n = 533) and tie stall (n = 59) barns were measured in relation to management and environmental factors in a retrospective cohort study of Norwegian dairy farms with automatic grain feeding systems. Herds with tie stalls were found to have a higher clinical mastitis rate, (61.6 cases per 100 cow-years versus 46.4 cases per 100 cow-years (p < 0.01)); a significantly higher proportion of herds with ketosis, (relative risk = 1.59, (p < 0.01)); and a lower mean fertility status index, (67.3 versus 82.8 (p < 0.01)). No significant difference in mean SCC was found between the 2 groups of dairies (p = 0.32). Large herds had higher Loge geometric mean SCC than small herds (p < 0.01) and herds with high SCC had lower milk production than herds with low SCC (p < 0.01). Herds that scored "very good" on cow cleanliness had significantly lower adjusted mean SCC than herds with scores of "average" or "good" (p < 0.05). Herds in barns with a concrete floor had an adjusted mean number of cases of clinical mastitis of 51.4 per 100 cow-years, 14 per cent higher than herds in barns with rubber mats, litter bed or wood (45.2 cases per 100 cow-years) (p < 0.05). Herds with high milk production level had higher FS-index than herds with low milk production (p < 0.01). Lower disease rates and the higher fertility status measured in the present study favor free stall herds over tie stall herds.

Forskjeller i frekvensen av ketose og klinisk mastitt, gjennomsnittlig celletall og fruktbarhetsstatus (FS-tall) mellom løsdriftsbesetninger og båsbesetninger ble undersøkt i relasjon til ulike miljøfaktorer blant Norske storfebesetninger med automatisk kraftfórtildeling.

Båsbesetningene hadde mer klinisk mastitt, (gjennomsnittlig 61.6 tilfeller pr 100 årskyr versus 46.4 tilfeller pr 100 årskyr (p<0.01)), høyere andel av besetninger med ketose, (relativ risk = 1.59, (p<0.01)), og lavere FS-tall, (gjennomsnittlig 67.3 versus 82.8 (p<0.01)). Ingen signifikant forskjell i gjennomsnittlig celletall ble funnet mellom de 2 gruppene av storfebesetninger (p = 0.32).

Store besetninger hadde høyere Log{ine} av geometrisk middel celletall enn små besetninger (p<0.01), og besetninger med høyt celletall hadde lavere melke-produksjon enn besetninger med lavt celletall (p<0.01). Besetninger med “svært godt” reinhold av kyme hadde signifikant lavere gjennomsnittlig celletall enn besetninger som hadde “middels” eller “godt” reinhold av kyme (p<0.05). Besetninger i fjøs med betong-golv hadde gjennomsnittlig 51.4 tilfeller av klinisk mastitt pr 100 årskyr, 14% mer enn besetninger med gummimatte, strøseng eller tre (45.2 tilfeller pr 100 årskyr (p<0.05)). Besetninger med høy melkeproduksjon hadde høyere FS-tall enn besetninger med lav melkeproduksjon (p<0.01).

Den lavere sjukdomfrekvens og høyere fruktbathets-status målt i denne undersøkelsen favoriserer løsdriftsbesetninger framfor båsbesetninger.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animal Husbandry / standards*
  • Animals
  • Cattle
  • Cell Count / veterinary
  • Cohort Studies
  • Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
  • Dairying / instrumentation
  • Dairying / methods*
  • Eating / physiology*
  • Female
  • Incidence
  • Ketosis / epidemiology
  • Ketosis / physiopathology
  • Ketosis / veterinary*
  • Linear Models
  • Mastitis, Bovine / epidemiology*
  • Mastitis, Bovine / pathology
  • Mastitis, Bovine / physiopathology
  • Milk / cytology*
  • Milk / metabolism
  • Models, Biological
  • Norway / epidemiology
  • Reproduction / physiology*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Surveys and Questionnaires