Integrating solar energy with agriculture: Industry perspectives on the market, community, and socio-political dimensions of agrivoltaics
Introduction
Despite the mature and promising potential for solar photovoltaic (PV) technology to retrench global reliance on fossil fuels, large-scale PV development is experiencing complex challenges, including land use conflict [1], [2], [3] and — as the scale of solar has increased — social resistance, which has previously been more commonly associated with large-scale wind farms [4], [5], [6]. Growth in large-scale PV development can create land use disputes, especially in instances of competition between land for agriculture versus energy production [1], [7], [8]. This history and growing concern over land use highlights the challenge of meeting the soaring demands for solar power while conserving rural and agricultural lands [9]. It is posited that the impact of solar development on land will be diminished by siting PV in a manner that is compatible with multiple uses [10], suggesting changes in conventional practices will be necessary.
Agrivoltaics, the co-development of land for both agriculture and PV, is an innovative and increasingly popular approach to solar development [11], [12], [13], [14]. This deliberate co-location of agriculture and PV is intended to alleviate land use competition [2] and boost revenues for landowners [15], among other benefits. Numerous empirical studies have investigated the technical viability of agrivoltaic systems, examining PV with plant cultivation [11], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], aquaponics [23], and livestock production [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. Overall, agrivoltaic systems have been demonstrated as a technically and economically practical use of agricultural land, capable of overcoming the dominant separation of food and energy production and increasing land productivity by 35–73% [11].
This work is part of a larger study of agrivoltaic technology [27] that involves technical and social research as well as life cycle assessment (DE-EE0008990). Interviews were conducted with both solar industry professionals and agricultural industry professionals [30]. Interviews with agricultural professionals suggests that the effective diffusion of the agrivoltaic innovation is strongly related to the acceptance of farmers [30], which further emphasizes the need to study the technology within a social context to identify and address relevant barriers. Analysis of both interview datasets was conducted inductively, meaning that a conceptual framework for making sense of the data was not applied prior to empirical examination of the interview transcripts. Inductive coding revealed that within the broad category of opportunities and barriers, solar industry professionals and agricultural industry professionals are focused on different considerations; agricultural industry professionals see agrivoltaics as an innovative technology and the diffusion of this innovation was discussed based on dimensions highlighted in the diffusion of innovations framework [30]. Solar industry professionals, in contrast, were also asked about opportunities and barriers, but their responses focused on the potential for agrivoltaics to improve the social acceptance of solar technology. The value of taking an inductive approach to this research is the opportunity it provides to reveal this divergence, the implications of which are considered in the discussion.
The specific intent of this study was to draw insight about solar development from participant experience, and responses indicate that the most considerable opportunities and barriers center on social acceptance and public perception issues. Perspectives about the opportunities and barriers to agrivoltaic development were captured via interviews with solar industry professionals, and inductive analysis revealed that interviewees were most focused on opportunities and barriers that correspond with Wüstenhagen et al.’s [4] three dimensions of social acceptance: market, community, and socio-political factors. The social acceptance of renewable energy is shaped by a complex interplay among market, community, and socio-political factors [4]. While this framework is constructive for understanding the varying dimensions of social acceptance, Devine-Wright et al. [31] assert that it is weak in terms of the relationships between dimensions, suggesting that further research should apply a holistic approach for discerning the interdependence among factors shaping social acceptance of renewable energy. The purpose of this study is therefore to explore the perceptions of industry professionals in the U.S. and consider the implications of the identified opportunities and barriers from a social science perspective.
While the participants of this study discuss this technology specifically in the context of their experience, which is primarily with grazing and pollinator applications, the results are relevant to agrivoltaics more broadly. By grounding to relevant solar industry professionals’ experience navigating solar development, the insights drawn from this study speak to the opportunities and barriers of various agrivoltaic applications through analytic generalization [29]. The findings can help land use planners, solar developers, and municipal governments make informed decisions that strategically and meaningfully integrate agriculture and solar and in turn provide multiple benefits including the retention of agricultural land, local economic development, and broad adoption of solar energy technologies.
Section snippets
Literature review
Social acceptance of renewable energy (RE) infrastructure plays a critical role in the furtherance of the RE transition and social science research helps to better understand the factors that impact acceptance and expansion of such technologies [4], [6], [31], [32], [33]. While many previous studies are focused on renewable sources of fuels and electricity including ethanol, wind, and hydro and are not specific to solar, they are nonetheless broadly applicable, emphasizing energy development as
Research methodology
In-depth, semi-structured interviews with U.S. solar industry professionals were selected as the most suitable methodology to explore perceptions regarding the opportunities and barriers to agrivoltaics. Interview methods establish validity of measurement by soliciting credible responses from participants and providing a means to gather nuanced descriptions surrounding the phenomenon under study [62], [63], [64]. While appropriate for the purpose of this study, interview methodology as a data
Findings: Understanding opportunities & barriers to agrivoltaics
The findings are organized below according to each dimension of social acceptance: market, community, and socio-political acceptance. Exact quotations, indicated in italics, are provided along with analysis. The results, which build directly on previous research on the social acceptance of renewable energy, offer the first insights into the social acceptance of agrivoltaics and identify opportunities, such as public perceptions, as critical. Section 5 provides a discussion of the implications
Discussion: Social acceptance of agrivoltaics
This research adds to an existing literature on the social acceptance of renewable energy by cataloging what industry professionals perceive to be the market, community, and socio-political dimensions shaping the opportunities and barriers associated with agrivoltaics. Results indicate that alignment among all three dimensions of acceptance will determine successful adoption of agrivoltaics; community acceptance was identified as the critical link bridging market adoption and socio-political
Conclusion
To address global demands for both food and energy, the relationship between critical land uses must become complementary rather than competitive. Because social acceptance of renewable energy technology is pivotal to energy transitions, this study reflects a proactive attempt to understand agrivoltaics from a solar industry professional’s perspective to better understand the significant opportunities and barriers to development. This research suggests that agrivoltaics are potentially
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Solar Energy Technology Office Award Number DE-EE0008990.
Disclaimer:
This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for
References (82)
- et al.
More solar farms or more bioenergy crops? Mapping and assessing potential land-use conflicts among renewable energy technologies in eastern Ontario, Canada
Appl. Geogr.
(2015) - et al.
Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept
Energy Policy
(2007) Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion
Energy Policy
(2013)Renewable energy and food supply: will there be enough land?
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2005)- et al.
Land-use requirements and the per-capita solar footprint for photovoltaic generation in the United States
Energy Policy
(2008) - et al.
Combining solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimising land use: Towards new agrivoltaic schemes
Renewable Energy
(2011) - et al.
The potential of agrivoltaic systems
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
(2016) - et al.
Productivity and radiation use efficiency of lettuces grown in the partial shade of photovoltaic panels
Eur. J. Agron.
(2013) - et al.
Colocation opportunities for large solar infrastructures and agriculture in drylands
Appl. Energy
(2016) - et al.
Water budget and crop modelling for agrivoltaic systems: Application to irrigated lettuces
Agric. Water Manag.
(2018)
Agrivoltaic systems to optimize land use for electric energy production
Appl. Energy
Dual use of agricultural land: Introducing ‘agrivoltaics’ in Phoenix Metropolitan Statistical Area, USA
Landscape Urban Plann.
Aquavoltaics: Synergies for dual use of water area for solar photovoltaic electricity generation and aquaculture
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure: Insights from energy storage
Energy Policy
Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned?
Energy Res. Social Sci.
Support for solar energy: Examining sense of place and utility-scale development in California
Energy Res. Social Sci.
Public attitudes regarding large-scale solar energy development in the US
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Utility-scale solar and public attitudes toward siting: A critical examination of proximity
Land Use Policy
The inclusion of social aspects in power planning
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Community renewable energy: What should it mean?
Energy Policy
Energy, land use and renewables- A changing agenda
Land Use Policy
Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments
Ecol. Econ.
Renewable energy systems: a societal and technological platform
Renewable Energy
Energy concepts for self-supplying communities based on local and renewable energy sources: A case study from northern Germany
Sustain. Citi. Soc.
Does civil society matter? Challenges and strategies of grassroots initiatives in Italy’s energy transition
Energy Res. Social Sci.
Householder engagement with energy consumption feedback: The role of community action and communications
Energy Policy
Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy: A tidal energy case study
J. Environ. Psychol.
Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generationʔ
Energy Policy
Changing sunshine: analyzing the dynamics of solar electricity policies in the global context
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study
J. Environ. Psychol.
Solar energy: Markets, economics and policies
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
The impact of state policy on deployment and cost of solar photovoltaic technology in the US: A sector-specific empirical analysis
Renew. Energy
Energy policy for energy sovereignty: Can policy tools enhance energy sovereignty?
Sol. Energy
Business model innovations for deploying distributed generation: The emerging landscape of community solar in the US
Energy Res. Social Sci.
Exploring and Contextualizing Public Opposition to Renewable Electricity in the United States
Sustainability
Energy Sprawl Is the Largest Driver of Land Use Change in United States
PLoS ONE
Cited by (113)
Financially-constrained solar development: A comparative analysis of urban fabrics and scalar expression in Portugal and Rajasthan
2024, Energy Research and Social ScienceEvaluating soil erosion and runoff dynamics in a humid subtropic, low stream order, southern plains watershed from cultivation and solar farm development
2024, International Soil and Water Conservation ResearchPerception of photovoltaic energy consumption in the Spanish primary sector. An environmentally profitable alternative
2024, Journal of Environmental ManagementA novel cloud enabled smart carbon neutral hydroponic setup for stem cutting propagation of tropical tree species
2024, Computers and Electronics in AgricultureSparking stakeholder support: Creating personas for renewable energy innovation adoption based on qualitative data analysis
2024, Energy Research and Social Science