Integrating solar energy with agriculture: Industry perspectives on the market, community, and socio-political dimensions of agrivoltaics

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102023Get rights and content

Abstract

Large-scale development of solar-generated electricity is hindered in some regions of the U.S. by land use competition and localized social resistance. One approach to alleviate these coupled challenges is agrivoltaics: the strategic co-location of solar photovoltaics and agriculture. To explore the opportunities and barriers for agrivoltaics, in-depth interviews with solar industry professionals were conducted and findings suggest that the potential for an agrivoltaic project to retain agricultural interests and consequently increase local support for development is the most significant opportunity of dual use solar. Capable of increasing community acceptance, participants expect agrivoltaics to play an important role in future solar endeavors, especially in places where development may be perceived as a threat to agricultural interests. The results further reveal the interconnections among the various dimensions of social acceptance and suggest that the growth of agrivoltaics is contingent on market adoption of the technology through community acceptance and supportive local regulatory environments. As solar photovoltaic systems transcend niche applications to become larger and more prevalent, the dimensions of social acceptance, including the opportunities and barriers associated with each dimension, can help inform decision making to enhance the growth of agrivoltaics and thus photovoltaic development. The findings can help land use planners, solar developers, and municipal governments make informed decisions that strategically and meaningfully integrate agriculture and solar, and in turn provide multiple benefits including the retention of agricultural land, local economic development, and broad adoption of solar energy technologies.

Introduction

Despite the mature and promising potential for solar photovoltaic (PV) technology to retrench global reliance on fossil fuels, large-scale PV development is experiencing complex challenges, including land use conflict [1], [2], [3] and — as the scale of solar has increased — social resistance, which has previously been more commonly associated with large-scale wind farms [4], [5], [6]. Growth in large-scale PV development can create land use disputes, especially in instances of competition between land for agriculture versus energy production [1], [7], [8]. This history and growing concern over land use highlights the challenge of meeting the soaring demands for solar power while conserving rural and agricultural lands [9]. It is posited that the impact of solar development on land will be diminished by siting PV in a manner that is compatible with multiple uses [10], suggesting changes in conventional practices will be necessary.

Agrivoltaics, the co-development of land for both agriculture and PV, is an innovative and increasingly popular approach to solar development [11], [12], [13], [14]. This deliberate co-location of agriculture and PV is intended to alleviate land use competition [2] and boost revenues for landowners [15], among other benefits. Numerous empirical studies have investigated the technical viability of agrivoltaic systems, examining PV with plant cultivation [11], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], aquaponics [23], and livestock production [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. Overall, agrivoltaic systems have been demonstrated as a technically and economically practical use of agricultural land, capable of overcoming the dominant separation of food and energy production and increasing land productivity by 35–73% [11].

This work is part of a larger study of agrivoltaic technology [27] that involves technical and social research as well as life cycle assessment (DE-EE0008990). Interviews were conducted with both solar industry professionals and agricultural industry professionals [30]. Interviews with agricultural professionals suggests that the effective diffusion of the agrivoltaic innovation is strongly related to the acceptance of farmers [30], which further emphasizes the need to study the technology within a social context to identify and address relevant barriers. Analysis of both interview datasets was conducted inductively, meaning that a conceptual framework for making sense of the data was not applied prior to empirical examination of the interview transcripts. Inductive coding revealed that within the broad category of opportunities and barriers, solar industry professionals and agricultural industry professionals are focused on different considerations; agricultural industry professionals see agrivoltaics as an innovative technology and the diffusion of this innovation was discussed based on dimensions highlighted in the diffusion of innovations framework [30]. Solar industry professionals, in contrast, were also asked about opportunities and barriers, but their responses focused on the potential for agrivoltaics to improve the social acceptance of solar technology. The value of taking an inductive approach to this research is the opportunity it provides to reveal this divergence, the implications of which are considered in the discussion.

The specific intent of this study was to draw insight about solar development from participant experience, and responses indicate that the most considerable opportunities and barriers center on social acceptance and public perception issues. Perspectives about the opportunities and barriers to agrivoltaic development were captured via interviews with solar industry professionals, and inductive analysis revealed that interviewees were most focused on opportunities and barriers that correspond with Wüstenhagen et al.’s [4] three dimensions of social acceptance: market, community, and socio-political factors. The social acceptance of renewable energy is shaped by a complex interplay among market, community, and socio-political factors [4]. While this framework is constructive for understanding the varying dimensions of social acceptance, Devine-Wright et al. [31] assert that it is weak in terms of the relationships between dimensions, suggesting that further research should apply a holistic approach for discerning the interdependence among factors shaping social acceptance of renewable energy. The purpose of this study is therefore to explore the perceptions of industry professionals in the U.S. and consider the implications of the identified opportunities and barriers from a social science perspective.

While the participants of this study discuss this technology specifically in the context of their experience, which is primarily with grazing and pollinator applications, the results are relevant to agrivoltaics more broadly. By grounding to relevant solar industry professionals’ experience navigating solar development, the insights drawn from this study speak to the opportunities and barriers of various agrivoltaic applications through analytic generalization [29]. The findings can help land use planners, solar developers, and municipal governments make informed decisions that strategically and meaningfully integrate agriculture and solar and in turn provide multiple benefits including the retention of agricultural land, local economic development, and broad adoption of solar energy technologies.

Section snippets

Literature review

Social acceptance of renewable energy (RE) infrastructure plays a critical role in the furtherance of the RE transition and social science research helps to better understand the factors that impact acceptance and expansion of such technologies [4], [6], [31], [32], [33]. While many previous studies are focused on renewable sources of fuels and electricity including ethanol, wind, and hydro and are not specific to solar, they are nonetheless broadly applicable, emphasizing energy development as

Research methodology

In-depth, semi-structured interviews with U.S. solar industry professionals were selected as the most suitable methodology to explore perceptions regarding the opportunities and barriers to agrivoltaics. Interview methods establish validity of measurement by soliciting credible responses from participants and providing a means to gather nuanced descriptions surrounding the phenomenon under study [62], [63], [64]. While appropriate for the purpose of this study, interview methodology as a data

Findings: Understanding opportunities & barriers to agrivoltaics

The findings are organized below according to each dimension of social acceptance: market, community, and socio-political acceptance. Exact quotations, indicated in italics, are provided along with analysis. The results, which build directly on previous research on the social acceptance of renewable energy, offer the first insights into the social acceptance of agrivoltaics and identify opportunities, such as public perceptions, as critical. Section 5 provides a discussion of the implications

Discussion: Social acceptance of agrivoltaics

This research adds to an existing literature on the social acceptance of renewable energy by cataloging what industry professionals perceive to be the market, community, and socio-political dimensions shaping the opportunities and barriers associated with agrivoltaics. Results indicate that alignment among all three dimensions of acceptance will determine successful adoption of agrivoltaics; community acceptance was identified as the critical link bridging market adoption and socio-political

Conclusion

To address global demands for both food and energy, the relationship between critical land uses must become complementary rather than competitive. Because social acceptance of renewable energy technology is pivotal to energy transitions, this study reflects a proactive attempt to understand agrivoltaics from a solar industry professional’s perspective to better understand the significant opportunities and barriers to development. This research suggests that agrivoltaics are potentially

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) under the Solar Energy Technology Office Award Number DE-EE0008990.

Disclaimer:

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for

References (82)

  • S. Amaducci et al.

    Agrivoltaic systems to optimize land use for electric energy production

    Appl. Energy

    (2018)
  • D. Majumdar et al.

    Dual use of agricultural land: Introducing ‘agrivoltaics’ in Phoenix Metropolitan Statistical Area, USA

    Landscape Urban Plann.

    (2018)
  • A.M. Pringle et al.

    Aquavoltaics: Synergies for dual use of water area for solar photovoltaic electricity generation and aquaculture

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2017)
  • P. Devine-Wright et al.

    A conceptual framework for understanding the social acceptance of energy infrastructure: Insights from energy storage

    Energy Policy

    (2017)
  • B.K. Sovacool et al.

    Conceptualizing the acceptance of wind and solar electricity

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2012)
  • J. Rand et al.

    Thirty years of North American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned?

    Energy Res. Social Sci.

    (2017)
  • J.E. Carlisle et al.

    Support for solar energy: Examining sense of place and utility-scale development in California

    Energy Res. Social Sci.

    (2014)
  • J.E. Carlisle et al.

    Public attitudes regarding large-scale solar energy development in the US

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2015)
  • J.E. Carlisle et al.

    Utility-scale solar and public attitudes toward siting: A critical examination of proximity

    Land Use Policy

    (2016)
  • F. Ribeiro et al.

    The inclusion of social aspects in power planning

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2011)
  • G. Walker et al.

    Community renewable energy: What should it mean?

    Energy Policy

    (2008)
  • G. Walker

    Energy, land use and renewables- A changing agenda

    Land Use Policy

    (1995)
  • A. Bergmann et al.

    Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developments

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2008)
  • H. Polatidis et al.

    Renewable energy systems: a societal and technological platform

    Renewable Energy

    (2007)
  • J.P. Petersen

    Energy concepts for self-supplying communities based on local and renewable energy sources: A case study from northern Germany

    Sustain. Citi. Soc.

    (2016)
  • Natalia Magnani et al.

    Does civil society matter? Challenges and strategies of grassroots initiatives in Italy’s energy transition

    Energy Res. Social Sci.

    (2016)
  • Kevin Burchell et al.

    Householder engagement with energy consumption feedback: The role of community action and communications

    Energy Policy

    (2016)
  • P. Devine-Wright

    Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy: A tidal energy case study

    J. Environ. Psychol.

    (2011)
  • H. Yin et al.

    Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generationʔ

    Energy Policy

    (2010)
  • R. Deshmukh et al.

    Changing sunshine: analyzing the dynamics of solar electricity policies in the global context

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2012)
  • M. Wolsink

    Wind power implementation: the nature of public attitudes: equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2007)
  • P. Devine-Wright et al.

    Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study

    J. Environ. Psychol.

    (2010)
  • G.R. Timilsina et al.

    Solar energy: Markets, economics and policies

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2012)
  • G. Shrimali et al.

    The impact of state policy on deployment and cost of solar photovoltaic technology in the US: A sector-specific empirical analysis

    Renew. Energy

    (2013)
  • C. Schelly et al.

    Energy policy for energy sovereignty: Can policy tools enhance energy sovereignty?

    Sol. Energy

    (2020)
  • E. Funkhouser et al.

    Business model innovations for deploying distributed generation: The emerging landscape of community solar in the US

    Energy Res. Social Sci.

    (2015)
  • E.H. Adeh, S.P. Good, M. Calaf, et al. Solar PV Power Potential is Greatest Over Croplands, Scient. Rep. 9, 2019,...
  • M.M.C. Swain, Managing stakeholder conflicts over energy infrastructure: case studies from New England's energy...
  • B. Sovacool

    Exploring and Contextualizing Public Opposition to Renewable Electricity in the United States

    Sustainability

    (2009)
  • E. Marcheggiani, H. Gulinck, A. Galli, Detection of fast landscape changes: The case of solar modules on agricultural...
  • A.M. Trainor

    Energy Sprawl Is the Largest Driver of Land Use Change in United States

    PLoS ONE

    (2016)
  • Cited by (113)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text