• You are here: News

Revealed: the 15 firms that went into administration in January

Generic administration Locked gate

Fewer construction firms entered administration in the first month of this year than in November and DecemberConstruction News can reveal.

Data from Creditsafe shows 15 construction companies filed for administration in January.

This reflects a downward month-to-month trend in administrations, with 34 construction companies falling into administration or receivership in November, followed by 23 in December. However, construction firms face continuing challenges to profitability from high interest rates, inflation, a labour shortage and higher wage demands.

The January 2023 figure is three higher than in January 2022, when 12 firms went under.

DRS Bond Management managing director Chris Davies told Construction News that “January is a strange time” because many companies will have chosen to postpone December payments until the following month.

He referred to recent data from Begbies Traynor on the rising number of firms subject to county court judgements above £5,000, and noted the likelihood that the tempo of winding-up petitions is likely to increase in the coming months, adding: “I can only see the trend [for administrations] remaining at the rate it was last year, if not higher.”

Data from the Insolvency Service for the last 12 months shows a 64% increase in construction insolvencies over the period "with the majority affecting specialist contractors", said Rebecca Larkin, head of research at the Construction Products Assocation.

"Historically, specialists have always accounted for a high proportion of construction insolvencies as they tend to suffer most from the pressures of fixed price contracts and particularly when faced with materials rising by over 20% and pressure on wage bills too... However, insolvencies among main contractors have begun to increase fastest, suggesting margins have been hit irreparably at the top of the supply chain too."

Data from Creditsafe shows that most of the firms that went under in January were too small to be legally required to file full accounts with Companies House, but there was one major exception.

S&I Groundworks, a housebuilding contractor based in Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire, described “significantly increased revenue and profits” in its most recent accounts, covering the 12 months ending 31 May 2021.

Turnover reached £41m compared with £24.7m in 2020, and S&I posted an operating profit of £1.79m, up from £1.16m the year before.

However, subsequent adverse trading conditions – such as the impact of COVID-19 and the Russian invasion of Ukraine last February – forced the firm to appoint administrators from KBL Advisory on 25 January.

KBL cited “significant cashflow pressure as a consequence of cost inflation and economic uncertainty” as the reason why S&I fell into administration.

The second-largest firm by turnover to go under in January was northern England-based housebuilder Brierstone.

It posted turnover of £9.65m and pre-tax profit of almost £105,000 in its most recent set of accounts, covering the year ending 31 August 2021.

Opus LLP was appointed as its administrator on 30 January.

“Execution risk is going to dominate 2023”

Chris Davies, DRS Bond Management

As government support under the Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme and the Large Companies Scheme tapers off, there is the prospect of more construction-related firms being unable to make repayments.

“There are an awful lot of companies that are essentially zombie companies,” Davies explained, noting: “Execution risk is going to dominate 2023.”

Late payments remain a critical issue for many firms in the supply chain. Significant cashflow challenges "exacerbated by a series of late payments" contributed to the demise of Dako Construction, according to Taz Rashid, co-managing director of administrators Quantuma.

Gareth Harris, partner at RSM UK Restructuring Advisory, noted that “the level of overdues has increased significantly and that is causing major working capital issues”.

Brendan Sharkey, head of construction and real estate at Macintyre Hudson, described on-site lighting costs as a concern "over the winter months – something that has never been an issue in the past in terms of an overhead."

Dry lining, curtain walling, facade and mechanical and electrical specialists in the supply chain were facing “real struggles”, Davies said. “Issues also remain with legacy fixed-price lump-sum contracts that were bid perhaps before or around the time COVID started.”

Harris noted that a “very tough” six months lie ahead for construction companies, “so survival may well represent success for many during that period.  After that there ought to be gradual improvement”.

Inflation is less of an issue for the construction sector as it is now baked into most calculations, Davies said. “Everybody has a contingency for inflation, and there’s a lot more common sense now about not always taking the lowest quote.”

There is also better understanding among clients that prices for major materials will fluctuate, Sharkey remarked.

“However, prices of labour and materials have been settling down to make quoting a little easier,” he noted. "When there is plenty of work margins also improve as firms do not chase work so much."

Instead of bidding at a loss, tenderers are now “either making modest buying gains or are static, which is how it should be”, Davies noted.

Inflation remains too high but it appears stable. Davies described it as “a 'known known'”, adding: “The 'unknown unknowns' in 2023 will be the people that you think you’ve got in your supply chain who aren’t there any more – that is, the companies with the labour [you need] to get to sites to do the work.”

Larkin remarked that construction insolvencies in 2022 were 27% higher compared to 2019 as a pre-pandemic baseline with construction output 2% higher.

She added: "This is obviously concerning given that a host of industry indicators are pointing to a slowdown in activity as the UK experiences a recession this year and begs the question that if insolvencies are already high, what happens when demand slows?"

Company name Location Date of administration Type of documents filed Construction activities
14 WATERLOO ROAD LTD Liverpool 27 Jan Administrative receiver appointed Development of building projects
BDBUILD LIMITED Hampshire 17 Jan Administration order Development of building projects
BIRNBECK (ST GEORGES HILL) LIMITED Berkshire 12 Jan Administrative receiver appointed Development of building projects
BRIERSTONE LIMITED Yorkshire 26 Jan Administration order Other building completion and finishing
CC1 KETTERING LIMITED Northamptonshire 16 Jan Administrative receiver appointed Construction of domestic buildings
DAKO CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Nottingham 30 Jan Administration order Other specialised construction activities
DELWEN LIMITED London 10 Jan Administrative receiver Aappointed Development of building projects
EK DEVCO LTD London 12 Jan Administration order Development of building projects
GS CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING LIMITED Hertfordshire 31 Jan Administration order Construction of commercial buildings
HAMES DEVELOPMENTS LTD Yorkshire 30 Jan Administrative receiver appointed Development of building projects
LOK DEVELOPMENTS 05 LIMITED Newcastle upon Tyne 2 Jan Administrative receiver appointed Construction of commercial buildings
LONDON SOUTH WEST SW LIMITED London 19 Jan Administration order Development of building projects
MAUDLAND LTD Lancashire 20 Jan Administrative receiver appointed Development of building projects
REMUS CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT LIMITED Surrey 26 Jan Administrative receiver appointed Construction of commercial buildings
S & I GROUNDWORKS LIMITED Staffordshire 25 Jan Administration order Construction of domestic buildings

 

Related articles