Australia eyes emerging LNG markets like India, Vietnam

  • Market: Natural gas
  • 24/02/22

Australia plans to target emerging LNG markets India, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, the Philippines and Bangladesh over the next 30 years and sees scope for more spot sales to European buyers seeking to diversify gas supply sources.

"We have identified seven emerging markets where Australia has the greatest opportunity to strengthen LNG trade," the Australian government's Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources said in its new Global Resources Strategy Commodity Report: LNG.

"Combined, these markets are expected to grow their LNG demand from 40mn t in 2020 to 255mn t in 2050," the report said. As well as increased LNG exports, there are opportunities for Australian participation along the entire LNG value chain in these markets. Opportunities include designing and constructing LNG import terminals and domestic gas distribution network, financing emerging LNG industries, operating gas production and LNG import facilities, and decommissioning retiring gas production facilities and restoring the environment, the report added.

Australia and Qatar vie for the title as world's largest LNG exporter, and the overwhelming majority of the more than 81mn t of LNG that Australia shipped last year went to four countries — China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

"We are equally well placed to maintain our four established markets, which will remain large sources of regional demand," it said. Australia has existing engagement channels with its established markets China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. "These should be maintained, but additional engagement efforts are likely not required," it added.

In contrast, Australia should step up its engagement efforts with emerging LNG markets. "This is especially true for emerging markets with high demand potential in the future India, Indonesia and Bangladesh," the report said.

Australia's traditional LNG buyers have largely purchased cargoes through long-term contracts, but emerging markets in the Asia-Pacific region are less inclined to strike long-term sales and purchase agreements. Medium- and long-term contracts continue to dominate global LNG trade. But the global LNG market is evolving into a more liquid spot market with shorter-term contracts, the report said.

LNG spot market trades now account for more than 30pc of total LNG trade, compared with less than 20pc in 2010, the report said. Increasing demand volatility and uncertainty in established LNG import markets are driving demand for more flexible supply options like LNG spot cargoes, it said.

India's LNG demand is forecast to increase to 36mn t/yr by 2030 to 63mn t/yr by 2040 and to 78mn t/yr by 2050, representing a near threefold increase from present levels, the report said. At this rate of growth, India is expected to overtake South Korea as the third-largest Asian LNG market by mid-2030s and to consume as much LNG as Japan by 2040, it said.

Indian state-controlled LNG importer Petronet has a sales and purchase agreement with ExxonMobil to secure 1.44mn t/yr of LNG from the Chevron-operated 15.6mn t/yr Gorgon LNG venture offshore Western Australia.

Bangladesh's LNG demand is forecast to reach 18mn t in 2030, 30mn t in 2040 and more than 36mn t by 2050, a nine-fold increase from 2020 levels, the report said.

Gas demand in Malaysia is expected to rise from 26.7mn t in 2021 to around 37mn t/yr in the late 2040s, before slowly dropping off, it said. The majority of this demand will be met by LNG imports in future because of declining gas reserves in Malaysia. Malaysia's use of LNG will grow from 17pc in 2020 to 42pc in 2030, it said.

Australia ships LNG cargoes to Malaysia through the 2mn t/yr sales and purchase agreement that Malaysia's state-owned Petronas has with the 7.8mn t/yr Gladstone LNG (GLNG) venture in Queensland, eastern Australia. Petronas owns 27.5pc of GLNG.


Sharelinkedin-sharetwitter-sharefacebook-shareemail-share

Related news posts

Argus illuminates the markets by putting a lens on the areas that matter most to you. The market news and commentary we publish reveals vital insights that enable you to make stronger, well-informed decisions. Explore a selection of news stories related to this one.

News
27/03/24

Louisiana pipeline crossing bill nears senate vote

Louisiana pipeline crossing bill nears senate vote

New York, 27 March (Argus) — The Louisiana state senate is scheduled to vote tonight on a bill seeking to clarify pipeline servitude rights and expedite pipeline crossing disputes, advancing legislation promoted by three natural gas pipeline companies involved in a legal battle with US midstream giant Energy Transfer. Natural gas transmission projects by Williams, Momentum Midstream and DT Midstream — which aim to connect growing production out of the prolific Haynesville shale to a wave of new LNG export terminals along the US Gulf coast — have been put on hold while legal proceedings between Energy Transfer and DT Midstream play out. All three companies' proposed pipelines would cross Energy Transfer's own Tiger pipeline in northern Louisiana. The three pipeline companies' projects propose an excessive number of crossings over the Tiger line, an attorney for Energy Transfer argued in a Louisiana senate committee last week, and Energy Transfer has the servitude rights to stop them. But Energy Transfer's "unique" interpretation of the civil code on pipeline crossings is hurting the economy of Louisiana, the author of the bill , Louisiana senator Alan Seabaugh (R), said last week. By blocking the construction of new pipelines out of the Haynesville, Energy Transfer is eliminating jobs and taxes that would be created by new infrastructure, he said. Moreover, by arguing its servitude rights extend above and below its existing pipeline "to the center of the earth," Energy Transfer is "asserting a right that nobody has ever asserted before," Seabaugh said. The Seabaugh bill clarifies that, unless explicitly stated otherwise in a contract, pipeline servitude rights extend only to the physical space occupied by the pipeline and any space necessary to maintain it. The contract stipulating Energy Transfer's servitude rights for the Tiger pipeline is silent on the subject of that vertical, underground space, according to bill supporters. "This really isn't about pipeline crossings — this is about controlling market share," said Jimmy Faircloth, attorney for Momentum Midstream. But the pipeline industry has been amicably working together for decades to allow for reciprocal crossings, Energy Transfer attorney Kay Medlin said. By ripping up this convention over a dispute involving so many crossings, and forcing an expedited legal proceeding for something which "is not a minor process," the Seabaugh bill threatens an industry "that ain't broke," she said. "This legislation will break it, and you will likely spend years trying to fix it, if you ever can," Medlin said. The Seabaugh bill is a companion to two bills which passed 100-0 and 99-0, respectively, in the Louisiana House of Representatives on 21 March. Those bills seek to clarify the law on pipeline crossings and to expedite proceedings on pipeline crossing disputes. By Julian Hast Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Read more
News

Grupo Carso expande su huella en energía


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Grupo Carso expande su huella en energía

Mexico City, 27 March (Argus) — En los últimos años Grupo Carso, dirigido por Carlos Slim, ha expandido sus operaciones en el sector de petróleo y gas natural, destacándose como uno de los pocos operadores que han fortalecido su presencia a pesar de las restricciones del presidente mexicano Andrés Manuel López Obrador a la inversión del sector privado. A medida que los independientes y las grandes empresas petroleras han empezado a cerrar sus negocios en medio de la falta de nuevas oportunidades en subastas de la fase de exploración y producción, el Grupo Carso ha adquirido dos de los mayores contratos de aguas someras en los últimos 12 meses y ha expresado interés en hacer nuevas adquisiciones. Durante una conferencia de prensa de cuatro horas en febrero, Slim confirmó el interés de la empresa en desempeñar "un papel más importante en el sector de los hidrocarburos y, finalmente, participar en los productos petroquímicos." Slim, la persona más rica de México y director de un conglomerado que abarca desde las telecomunicaciones hasta la minería, también expresó su interés por "ser socio de alguien con experiencia" y por aumentar la participación de la empresa en el operador independiente estadounidense Talos Energy. La división de energía de Grupo Carso, Carso Energy, tenía un papel marginal en el sector aguas arriba de México antes de esta administración, con derechos de producción y exploración de dos bloques terrestres asegurados tras la reforma energética de 2014. A pesar de que los contratos se adjudicaron en 2017, los bloques 12 y 13 de Veracruz siguen en fase de exploración en medio de la falta de equipos de perforación disponibles y la presencia del crimen organizado en la zona, que ha impedido el acceso al emplazamiento, el operador informó al regulador de petróleo CNH el pasado diciembre. Pero los dos bloques terrestres son pequeños en comparación con los bloques de aguas poco profundas que Grupo Carso compró el año pasado. En septiembre, Grupo Carso completó la compra por $124 millones de una acción de 49.9pc en la filial mexicana de Talos Energy, involucrada también en el mega yacimiento de aguas superficiales de Zama que se está desarrollando con la paraestatal Pemex. Con un pico pronosticado de producción de 180,000 b/d de crudo para 2026, el yacimiento sería el segundo campo de producción de crudo más importante de México según las cifras de enero. El pasado diciembre, Carso Energy llegó a un acuerdo de $530 millones para adquirir el bloque de aguas someras 4 del conglomerado mexicano Petrobal en la cuenca sureste. El bloque es el tercer contrato de producción de crudo más alto, con una producción de 11,784 b/d en enero, según la CNH. Inversiones en gas En el sector del gas, Carso Energy también opera el gasoducto de gas natural Sasabe-Samalayuca de 472mn cf/d y es socio en las líneas estadounidenses de interconexión Waha-Presidio y Waha-San Elizario. Pero mientras que la mayoría de las empresas del sector de la energía han visto un colapso de las oportunidades de inversión durante la administración de López Obrador, el Grupo Carso parece ser una de las pocas empresas del sector privado con las que el presidente permitirá que las empresas estatales Pemex y CFE hagan negocios. CFE adjudicó directamente un nuevo contrato de gasoducto al operador en diciembre del año pasado, con un acuerdo para ampliar la línea de gas Sasabe-Samalayuca de 416km y 472mn cf/d de Sasabe, Sonora a Mexicali, Baja California. López Obrador, a menudo crítico de las empresas del sector privado dentro del sector de la energía, incluso ha elogiado el papel creciente de Slim en el mercado del petróleo y el gas, celebrando su adquisición del contrato Petrobal por permitirle "permanecer en manos mexicanas." Mirando hacia el futuro, los profundos bolsillos del Grupo Carso podrían convertirlo en un socio potencial para desarrollar el campo de gas de aguas profundas de Lakach tras la decisión de New Fortress Energy de retirarse el pasado mes de noviembre. Pero el entorno de bajos precios del gas podría complicar el proyecto en el que Pemex ya ha invertido $1.4 mil millones, mientras que la falta de experiencia de Carso en aguas profundas plantea preguntas sobre su viabilidad como socio. Carso Energy representó sólo 1.6pc de los Ps55.4 mil millones ($3.29 mil millones) totales de ventas del Grupo Carso durante el cuarto trimestre del año pasado, pero la estrategia de adquisición del grupo y el estatus favorecido frente a la administración podrían ver esa cuota aumentar en los próximos años. Por Rebecca Conan Proyectos de energía de Carso Proyecto Tipo de proyecto Tamaño/capacidad Bloque 12 E&P en tierra Fase de exploración Bloque 13 E&P en tierra Fase de exploración Zama E&P en aguas someras 180,000 b/d crudo en 2026 Bloque 4 E&P en aguas someras 11,784 b/d crudo en enero Sasabe-Samalayuca Gasoducto 472mn cf/d Waha-Presidio Gasoducto 1.4 Bcf/d Waha-San Elizario Gasoducto 1.1 Bcf/d Grupo Carso Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Serica CEO warns on UK offshore investment


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Serica CEO warns on UK offshore investment

London, 27 March (Argus) — The lack of a stable offshore fiscal regime is creating shareholder pressure on UK-focused independent oil and gas operators to invest abroad, according to outgoing Serica Energy chief executive Mitch Flegg. "The feedback I get from shareholders and from banks is: 'What are you doing in the UK? We want you to invest in other parts of the world'," Flegg told attendees at a meeting of industry group Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) today. "That's the elephant in the room. We can't ignore that." The UK government introduced an Energy Profits Levy (EPL) windfall tax on oil and gas profits in summer 2022 in response to the jump in energy prices resulting from Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Initially the levy meant profits were taxed at 65pc, but by the start of last year this was 75pc. In February, UK finance minister Jeremy Hunt extended the duration of the EPL for a year to 2029. Flegg said the offshore oil and gas sector is "not whining about the levy itself" but it is concerned about "the continual changes in the fiscal regime and it's the instability, rather than the rate, that we're worried about". Serica, which in recent months has averaged production of 45,500 b/d of oil equivalent (boe/d) in the UK offshore, is now facing pressure to look at other countries, such as Norway. While that country has always had a 78pc tax rate, "that doesn't put us off at looking at working [there]", Flegg said. "What makes it more attractive is that it's been stable and the allowances that go with that are well thought through and have been there for years and years," he said. Flegg said another concern is offshore regulator NSTA's new emissions reduction plan, announced today , which could see the authority require operators to cease production of assets with high-emissions intensity as part of an increased drive for electrification at offshore facilities. Flegg acknowledged the industry has needed encouragement "to move in the right direction" on emissions, but said some elements of the NSTA plan "have gone too far" and that important infrastructure could be lost if facilities shut down because of a lack of electrification. "This is a fragile industry. We all depend upon each other and we've built upon the supply chain," he said. "The supply chain depends on operators and operators depend upon the infrastructure that's out there. "If the infrastructure doesn't exist then we're not going to be able to tie back new discoveries." Flegg, who will step down as Serica chief executive in mid-April, was speaking at the launch of OEUK's Business and Supply Chain Outlook report. This said UK offshore oil and gas production will continue to decline at double-digit rates if measures are not taken to improve the investment environment. By Jon Mainwaring Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Oil transition plans inadequate for investors: Report


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Oil transition plans inadequate for investors: Report

London, 27 March (Argus) — Oil and gas producers' energy transition plans are "insufficient for investors to accurately gauge transition risk", according to a report released today from investor initiative Climate Action 100+ and investor research group Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI). Several companies measured have net zero goals, but there is an "absence of disclosure on critical elements", which makes it difficult for investors to understand how companies will achieve net zero, as well as the transition risks posed. The lack of sufficient transition plans presents a "material financial risk", Climate Action 100+ said. The report assessed 10 publicly-listed oil and gas producers — European firms BP, Eni, Repsol, Shell and TotalEnergies, and North American companies Chevron, ConocoPhillips, ExxonMobil, Occidental and Suncor. The companies scored lowest against 'alignment' metrics, measuring if they are in line with the Paris climate agreement that seeks to limit global warming to 1.5°C above the pre-industrial average. "More disclosure is required on the central aspects of transition planning, including measures to neutralise emissions, and production forecasts", TPI found. Companies assessed failed to score on 87pc of metrics related to quantifying emissions cuts, and on 89pc of metrics related to future oil and gas production. Most North American firms assessed have stated they plan to lift output, the report noted. But "without acknowledging the impact of the transition on the core business, companies risk deploying capital that… accentuates the risk of assets becoming stranded", it said. The report flagged a stark difference between the two regions. "European companies provide substantially better disclosure, set more aligned targets and are investing more in climate solutions", it said. North American firms are "not planning to meaningfully diversify into low carbon energy production", while European ones are exploring a range of lower-carbon options, including biofuels, hydrogen and renewable power. The companies assessed are also not reaching for "easy wins" on methane abatement, with just two having "convincing strategies" on this, the report found. Of the 10 companies, seven have joined reduction initiative the Oil and Gas Methane Partnership, but "most companies have not set a methane emissions reduction target with a clear and specific base and target year." Investment is crucial for companies looking to decarbonise. A report this week from non-profit CDP and consulting firm Oliver Wyman found that more than half of corporations in high-emitting sectors said access to capital was "a key concern in decarbonisation efforts". Their report analysed data from 1,600 European companies, which reported via CDP's environmental disclosures programme. "This implementation gap between concrete business actions and stated climate goals persists despite most businesses reporting they have a transition plan and emissions reduction targets in place", CDP said. By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

News

Electrification key to cut UK offshore emissions: NSTA


27/03/24
News
27/03/24

Electrification key to cut UK offshore emissions: NSTA

London, 27 March (Argus) — The UK offshore oil and gas industry must make "decisive emissions reduction actions now and on an ongoing basis", with asset electrification and low carbon power central to making cuts, regulator the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) said today. "Where the NSTA considers electrification reasonable, but it has not been done, there should be no expectation that the NSTA will approve field development plans", the regulator said in a new emissions reduction plan. The NSTA set out "four clear contributing factors to decarbonising the industry" — including asset electrification, investment and efficiency and action on flaring and venting. It will also look at "inventory as a whole", ramping up scrutiny on assets with high emissions intensity. Relevant companies must produce emissions reduction action plans for offshore assets, the NSTA said. New developments with first oil or gas after the beginning of 2030 must be either fully electrified or run on "alternative low carbon power with near equivalent emission reductions", the NSTA said. New developments with first oil or gas before 2030 should be electrification-ready at minimum. If electrification is not reasonable, other power emissions reductions must be sought, the regulator said. The offshore industry must from 1 June provide "a documented method of the split of projected flaring and venting figures into categories", and must from 1 June 2025 have a plan and budget to "deliver continuous improvements in flaring and venting", it said. New developments — including tie-backs — must be planned on the basis of zero routine flaring and venting, which every asset must reach by 2030. Industry flaring almost halved between 2018-22, the NSTA said. The regulator has flagged a particular focus on methane emissions. The NSTA may require developers to agree to cease production of assets with high emissions intensity "with reference to societal carbon values", it said. Societal carbon values are calculated by the UK government to reflect the marginal cost to society of additional CO2 emissions. It will discuss end dates for production for assets with greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions intensity 50pc over the average for the UK offshore, and which intend to produce oil or gas beyond 2030. This represents a slight watering down of the initial plan the NSTA consulted on last year. The North Sea Transition Deal, agreed in 2021, commits the UK offshore industry to reducing its production emissions of GHGs by 10pc by 2025, by 24pc by 2027 and by 50pc by 2030, from a 2018 baseline. Industry has itself committed to a 90pc reduction by 2040 and a net zero basin by 2050, the NSTA said. It "would welcome industry owning and delivering these reductions", it said, adding that its plan is focused on emissions cuts and "emissions offsetting will not be considered towards meeting the obligations." By Georgia Gratton Send comments and request more information at feedback@argusmedia.com Copyright © 2024. Argus Media group . All rights reserved.

Business intelligence reports

Get concise, trustworthy and unbiased analysis of the latest trends and developments in oil and energy markets. These reports are specially created for decision makers who don’t have time to track markets day-by-day, minute-by-minute.

Learn more