Abstract
Nano-structured materials are used in electronics, diagnostics, therapeutics, smart packaging, energy management and textiles, areas critical for society and quality of life. However, their fabrication often places high demands on limited natural resources. Accordingly, renewable sources for the feedstocks used in their production are highly desirable. We demonstrate the use of readily available biopolymers derived from maize (zein), milk (casein) and malacostraca (crab-shell derived chitin) in conjunction with sacrificial templates, self-assembled monodisperse latex beads and anodized aluminium membranes, for producing robust surfaces coated with highly regular hyperporous networks or wire-like morphological features, respectively. The utility of this facile strategy for nano-structuring of biopolymers was demonstrated in a surface based-sensing application, where biotin-selective binding sites were generated in the zein-based nano-structured hyperporous network.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The nano- and micro-scale morphologies of materials are critical for their use in many applications where efficient mass-transfer is important, e.g., biomaterials, heterogenous catalysis, separation technology and bio- and chemo-sensing1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. The development of sustainable methods facilitating the large-scale production of materials with pre-determined nano- and micro-scale morphologies and physico-chemical properties is therefore highly desirable9,10,11,12. Sacrificial templates offer a valuable tool for generating such morphological features, as has been demonstrated using a variety of template materials13 ranging from hard porous membranes, e.g., anodized alumina membranes (AAM)14,15 and silica beads16,17, to soft monodispersed latex (polystyrene) beads (LB)17,18,19 and micelles20,21,22, each of which can be selectively removed after being used to guide the formation of the desired material architecture23. Readily available biopolymers24,25,26,27, e.g. oligopeptides (proteins) and oligosaccharides, are finding increased use in technology-focused applications28,29,30,31, therefore offering the potential for use in nanomaterial developments due to the diversity of physico-chemical features biomacromolecules can offer in conjunction with the potential for them being obtained from sustainable sources32,33. To demonstrate the possibility of using biopolymers for templated nano-material fabrication, studies were first performed using zein34,35,36,37,38, a storage protein in maize39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46, as a feedstock together with latex beads (LB) and anodized alumina membrane (AAM) as sacrificial templates for generating protein-based long-range nano-structured materials. In this study, we use LB and AAM as sacrificial structures to synthesize protein (zein and casein) and oligosaccharide (chitosan) nano-structured surfaces. For comparative purposes, zein-derived thin films were also prepared in the absence of sacrificial template.
Sacrificial LB template surfaces were prepared using aqueous solutions of monodispersed latex (polystyrene) beads [100 (LB1), 300 (LB3) or 800 nm (LB8)] which were drop-coated on functionalized Au/quartz or silicon wafer (Scheme 1-SI) and residual solvent (water) evaporated (Sect. 1.3.2 in SI). The morphologies of the latex bead-coated surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), which revealed highly compact and uniform lattice-like arrangement of the beads with long-range uniformity (see also, Fig. 1A–C-SI). In the case of AAM, with well-defined cylindrical nanopores (Fig. 1D-SI), membranes were placed directly on the substrate surfaces.
Nanostructured zein surfaces were prepared by drop-casting methanolic solutions of defatted-zein on functionalized Au/quartz or silicon wafer in the presence of sacrificial latex beads (Scheme 1-SI) or alumina membrane (Scheme 2-SI), or absence of a sacrificial template (Table 1-SI). After solvent evaporation under vacuum, the LBs and AAM sacrificial templates were selectively dissolved in toluene and aqueous HCl, respectively. SEM images of the zein films after extraction of the LB sacrificial templates showed long-range arrays (mm scale) of interconnected uniform spherical cavities with dimensions reflecting the size of the latex bead used (Figs. 1A–C, 2-SI). Interestingly, the magnitudes of the differences in the resonant frequencies corresponding to masses of the zein film prepared with and without LB on Au/quartz surfaces decreased with increased bead size (Table 2-SI). This can be attributed to the larger cavities (lower polymer density) present in the films prepared with the larger beads.
In the case of zein films fabricated using AAM as a sacrificial template, SEM images revealed long-range arrays of 150 nm thick coatings of zein-based nanowire-like features (Fig. 1D). The thickness of the nanowires can be manipulated by using AAMs with different pore sizes (Fig. 3B-SI). The lower mass of zein deposited in the presence of AAM (Table 2-SI), relative to the corresponding thin film (Fig. 1E), again demonstrated the lower densities arising from the spacing of the nanowires (Fig. 3A-SI).
Infrared spectra revealed features indicative of defatted zein film (Fig. 2)47. Characteristic bands for the predominant alpha-zein conformers corresponding to amine, amide I α-helix, amide I β-sheet, amide II, C–C, amide III stretching, and N–H deformation modes are evident at 3308, 1678, 1623, 1535, 1447, 1238, and 700 cm−1, respectively. Importantly, bands at 1678 and 1623 cm−1 were not shifted significantly from those of native defatted zein47 indicating the conservation of native α-helix and β-sheet structure, respectively. This suggests that the mechanism of interaction between zein proteins in the nanostructured film is similar to that in nature47,48,49. In the LB-templated zein film, characteristic bands for polystyrene (Fig. 4A-SI), δ(C–H) 695, 752, aromatic ν(C–C) 1451, 1492, overtones from 1800 to 2000 cm−1 and aromatic ν(C–H) 3023 and 3058 cm−1) were absent after extraction with toluene, indicating the efficient removal of the sacrificial LBs.
We then moved on to investigate the impact of the nanostructured zein films on permeability with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) using Fe(CN)63−/Fe(CN)64− as a redox couple. The real and imaginary components of the complex-plane impedance measure the diffusion of an electroactive redox couple through the porous biopolymer film reflecting. Impedance plot for zein films shows an arc at higher frequencies (Fig. 3) in contrast to the unhindered diffusion-controlled electron transfer reaction on a bare Au surface with a straight line inclined with a gradient of π/4 (Fig. 4B-SI). The diameter of this arc is the measure of the charge transfer resistance (Rct) and the diffusion afforded by the biopolymer film for the redox electron transfer reaction. The larger the diameter the greater the resistance to charge transfer or diffusion. The biopolymer film templated with 100 nm beads before extraction with toluene shows higher Rct (135.5 ± 4.3 kΩ) (Table 1, Fig. 3) than the unmodified gold surface (200 Ω) (Fig. 4B-SI). Upon extraction of the templated beads in toluene the Rct value is significantly reduced (68.5 ± 3.1 kΩ) owing to the diffusion of the redox couple via the pathway generated through the interconnected pores in the zein film (Fig. 1A). This behavior was observed for all LB-templated zein films (Table 1). Noticeably, 800 nm LB-templated zein films displayed even lower Rct values (41.7 ± 2.2 kΩ), attributed to the greater pore size enabling more effective diffusion of the redox couple. These decreasing Rct values reflect the more macroporous nature of the zein films obtained when using larger-sized LBs. Thickness of the Z-LB3 film was measured using profilometry and estimated to be 2 µm (Fig. 4C-SI), as compared to the Z-MeOH film (200 nm). Accordingly, the zein film corresponds to 5–6 hyperporous layers of the sacrificial LB3 structures. The number of the hyperporous layers present in a film of similar thickness would be expected to increase with smaller size latex beads.
The zein nanowire-coated surfaces were more permeable than thin-film controls (Fig. 1E), as revealed by reduced Rct values when compared to zein provide access or channel for the diffusion for redox couple, though less permeable than the highly porous LB templated zein films (Table 1). The stabilities of the LB- and AAM-derived zein nanostructures were monitored after storage in PBS (pH 7.4) at 20 °C for 6 months (see Sect. 1.4-SI). No significant changes in the zein nanostructured surfaces were observed by SEM (Fig. 5-SI), highlighting the robust nature of these materials.
The potential for deploying zein nano-structured materials to enhance sensor performance through improved mass-transfer was examined by fabricating a series of biotin imprinted zein nanostructures on Au/quartz resonator surfaces. The performance of these surfaces was studied using a quartz crystal microbalance and flow injection analysis (FIA) and compared with their non-imprinted counterparts and non-nanostructured zein coatings (Fig. 6-SI). Selective biotin recognition was demonstrated, and the LB3-templated imprinted materials induced significant enhancements in sensitivity. The hierarchical imprinted material architectures produced by combining molecular imprinting with the use of sacrificial templates illustrated the potential for these materials in applications requiring efficient mass-transfer. It is important to note that the total binding is enhanced by the larger available surface area, which results from contributions for both the non-specific binding and the increased accessibility to sites selective for biotin.
The scope for nano-structuring other readily available biopolymers was examined by replacing zein with the milk protein casein and the crustacean (e.g. Malacostraca, crab) derived oligosaccharide chitosan. SEM revealed that the nano-structured surfaces prepared using sacrificial LB-template displayed features comparable to those obtained using zein (Figs. 7- and 8-SI). When using AAM as a template, chitosan nanowires were readily obtained (Fig. 8B-SI), though casein nanowires did not survive the low pH used for the extraction of alumina membrane. RAIR spectra of the casein and chitosan nanostructures (Figs. 9-, 10-SI) showed the presence of –NH2, CONH2 and OH functionalities groups comparable to those of the corresponding non-templated biopolymer films Ca-EtOH and CHI-AcOH. The permeability characteristics of the casein and chitosan nanostructured films reflected those obtained with zein (Table 1). However, the casein and chitosan films were not as stable as those produced with zein as evidenced by the deformation of the macroporous structure (Figs. 11- and 12-SI) after storage for 6 months. These observations were reflected in EIS permeability studies, which showed insignificant differences in Rct value for zein films after storage, whereas casein and chitosan films showed a sharp increase in Rct values after storage indicating the onset of deformation. (Table 3-SI). This is in agreement with the reported stability of the zein films to solvents and high ionic strengths50.
Nanostructured biopolymer films can be easily obtained using sacrificial templates and readily available and renewable biopolymer feedstocks. This facile bench-top method provides access to material morphologies and associated permeabilities that can be used to advantage in situations requiring efficient mass-transfer, as illustrated here by the introduction of hierarchical features into nanostructured zein films through biotin molecular imprinting and use for enhancing biotin detection using a quartz crystal microbalance. The capacity to tailor nanostructure characteristics through choice of sacrificial template and biopolymer opens for the use of biopolymer-based nanostructured materials in a range of surface-based technologies. Studies are underway to explore the broader application of these materials in surface-based sensors and as catalytic supports.
References
Cao, X. J. et al. Design and synthesis of sillenite-based micro/nanomaterials and their applications in photocatalysis. Prog. Chem. 32, 262–273 (2020).
Tang, R. & Li, P. Synthesis and application of hierarchically structured nano-alumina. Prog. Chem. 24, 284–293 (2012).
Sari, D. P. et al. Micro/nano surface topography and 3D bioprinting of biomaterials in tissue engineering. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 16, 8909–8922 (2016).
Auchter, E. et al. Ultra-thin and strong formvar-based membranes with controlled porosity for micro- and nano-scale systems. Nanotechnology 29, 215712 (2018).
Ariga, K. et al. Self-assembly as a key player for materials nanoarchitectonics. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 20, 51–95 (2019).
Ariga, K. Progress in molecular nanoarchitectonics and materials nanoarchitectonics. Molecules 26, 1621 (2021).
Wei, Y. S., Zou, L. L., Wang, H. F., Wang, Y. & Xu, Q. Micro/nano-scaled metal-organic frameworks and their derivatives for energy applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 2003970 (2021).
Ariga, K., Mori, T., Kitao, T. & Uemura, T. Supramolecular chiral nanoarchitectonics. Adv. Mater. 32, 1905657 (2020).
Nasrollahzadeh, M., Sajjadi, M., Iravani, S. & Varma, R. S. Starch, cellulose, pectin, gum, alginate, chitin and chitosan derived (nano) materials for sustainable water treatment: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 251, 116986 (2021).
de Zarate, D. O. et al. Green and sustainable manufacture of ultrapure engineered nanomaterials. Nanomaterials 10, 466 (2020).
Liu, X. Y., Wang, K. X. & Chen, J. S. Template-directed metal oxides for electrochemical energy storage. Energy Storage Mater. 3, 1–17 (2016).
Yang, Y. et al. Progress in developing metal oxide nanomaterials for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700555 (2017).
Liu, Y., Goebl, J. & Yin, Y. Templated synthesis of nanostructured materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 2610–2653 (2013).
Bian, S. J., Wu, H. Q., Jiang, X. H., Long, Y. F. & Chen, Y. Syntheses and applications of hybrid mesoporous silica membranes. Prog. Chem. 26, 1352–1360 (2014).
Li, S. Y. et al. Strategies to control zeolite particle morphology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 885–907 (2019).
Barahona, F., Turiel, E., Cormack, P. A. G. & Martin-Esteban, A. Chromatographic performance of molecularly imprinted polymers: Core-shell microspheres by precipitation polymerization and grafted MIP films via Iniferter-modified silica beads. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 48, 1058–1066 (2010).
Du, K. F., Cui, X. D. & Tang, B. Template-directed synthesis of hollow silica beads by an interfacial sol-gel route. Chem. Eng. Sci. 98, 212–217 (2013).
Gaulding, E. A. et al. Fabrication and optical characterization of polystyrene opal templates for the synthesis of scalable, nanoporous (photo)electrocatalytic materials by electrodeposition. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 11601–11614 (2017).
Li, J. J. et al. Synthesis and photocatalysis of mesoporous titania templated by natural rubber latex. RSC Adv. 5, 21480–21486 (2015).
Dong, R. H., Liu, W. M. & Hao, J. C. Soft vesicles in the synthesis of hard materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 504–513 (2012).
Poolakkandy, R. R. & Menamparambath, M. M. Soft-template-assisted synthesis: A promising approach for the fabrication of transition metal oxides. Nanoscale Adv. 2, 5015–5045 (2020).
Zhao, T. C., Elzatahry, A., Li, X. M. & Zhao, D. Y. Single-micelle-directed synthesis of mesoporous materials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 775–791 (2019).
Martín, J., Maiz, J., Sacristan, J. & Mijangos, C. Tailored polymer-based nanorods and nanotubes by “template synthesis”: From preparation to applications. Polymer 53, 1149–1166 (2012).
Ling, S. et al. Biopolymer nanofibrils: Structure, modeling, preparation, and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 85, 1–56 (2018).
Ling, S., Kaplan, D. L. & Buehler, M. J. Nanofibrils in nature and materials engineering. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 18016–18019 (2018).
Shaghaleh, H., Xu, X. & Wang, S. Current progress in production of biopolymeric materials based on cellulose, cellulose nanofibers, and cellulose derivatives. RSC Adv. 8, 825–842 (2018).
Zhu, Y., Romain, C. & Williams, C. K. Sustainable polymers from renewable resources. Nature 540, 354–362 (2016).
Dutta, S., Bhaumik, A. & Wu, K. C. W. Hierarchically porous carbon derived from polymers and biomass: Effect of interconnected pores on energy applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3574–3592 (2014).
George, A., Sanjay, M. R., Srisuk, R., Parameswaranpillai, J. & Siengchin, S. A comprehensive review on chemical properties and applications of biopolymers and their composites. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 154, 329–338 (2020).
Nitta, S. K. & Numata, K. Biopolymer-based nanoparticles for drug/gene delivery and tissue engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 1629–1654 (2013).
Xu, W. Y., Wang, X. J., Sandler, N., Willfor, S. & Xu, C. L. Three-dimensional printing of wood-derived biopolymers: A review focused on biomedical applications. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 5663–5680 (2018).
Pistol, C. & Dwyer, C. Scalable, low-cost, hierarchical assembly of programmable DNA nanostructures. Nanotechnology 18, 125301–125304 (2007).
Cooper, K. Scalable nanomanufacturing—A review. Micromachines 8, 21–28 (2017).
Shukla, R. & Cheryan, M. Zein: The industrial protein from corn. Ind. Crops Prod. 13, 171–192 (2001).
Brahatheeswaran, D. et al. Hybrid fluorescent curcumin loaded zein electrospun nanofibrous scaffold for biomedical applications. Biomed. Mater. 7, 045001 (2012).
Wang, Y. & Padua, G. W. Nanoscale characterization of zein self-assembly. Langmuir 28, 2429–2435 (2012).
Deng, L. L., Li, Y., Feng, F. Q. & Zhang, H. Study on wettability, mechanical property and biocompatibility of electrospun gelatin/zein nanofibers cross-linked by glucose. Food Hydrocoll. 87, 1–10 (2019).
Lawton, J. W. Zein: A history of processing and use. Cereal Chem. 79, 1–18 (2002).
Dong, J., Sun, Q. S. & Wang, J. Y. Basic study of corn protein, zein, as a biomaterial in tissue engineering, surface morphology and biocompatibility. Biomaterials 25, 4691–4697 (2004).
Corradini, E. et al. Recent advances in food-packing, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications of zein and zein-based materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 22438–22470 (2014).
Hoffman, K. L., Han, I. Y. & Dawson, P. L. Antimicrobial effects of corn zein films impregnated with nisin, lauric acid, and EDTA. J. Food Prot. 64, 885–889 (2001).
Luo, Y. C. & Wang, Q. Zein-based micro- and nano-particles for drug and nutrient delivery: A review. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 131, 40696 (2014).
Zhang, Y. et al. Zein-based films and their usage for controlled delivery: Origin, classes and current landscape. J. Control. Release 206, 206–219 (2015).
Luecha, J., Hsiao, A., Brodsky, S., Liu, L. & Kokini, J. Green microfluidic devices made of corn proteins. Lab Chip 11, 3419–3524 (2011).
Serna, C. P. & Filho, J. F. L. Biodegradable zein-based blend films: structural, mechanical and barrier properties. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 53, 348–353 (2015).
Maharjan, B., Joshi, M. K., Tiwari, A. P., Park, C. H. & Kim, C. S. In-situ synthesis of AgNPs in the natural/synthetic hybrid nanofibrous scaffolds: Fabrication, characterization and antimicrobial activities. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 65, 66–76 (2017).
Subramanian, S. & Sampath, S. Adsorption of zein on surfaces with controlled wettability and thermal stability of adsorbed zein films. Biomacromol 8, 2120–2128 (2007).
Zhan, F., Yan, X., Sheng, F. & Li, B. Facile in situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles on tannic acid/zein electrospun membranes and their antibacterial, catalytic and antioxidant activities. Food Chem. 330, 127172 (2020).
Torres-Giner, S., Gimenez, E. & Lagaron, J. M. Characterization of the morphology and thermal properties of Zein Prolamine nanostructures obtained by electrospinning. Food Hydrocoll. 22, 601–614 (2008).
Oh, Y. & Flanagan, D. Swelling and permeability characteristics of zein membranes. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 57, 208–217 (2003).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet, grant number 2014-4573), the Swedish Knowledge Foundation (grant number 20190114) and Linnaeus University for financial support. We thank Assoc. Prof. Per H Nilsson for comments on the manuscript.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Linnaeus University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed equally to conceptualization and design. S.S. undertook all experimental work. Both authors contributed to analysis and drafting of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Suriyanarayanan, S., Nicholls, I.A. Making nanostructured materials from maize, milk and malacostraca. Sci Rep 11, 24420 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04001-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04001-4
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.