SCIENTISTS found microplastics on the surface of 80% of the waters they tested off the Scottish coast in 2021 and 2022, The Ferret can reveal.
Microplastics are tiny plastic litter measuring less than five millimetres. They either come from large pieces of plastic which have broken down over time, or from pellets used in industry and cosmetic products.
The highest concentration at the sites tested in the last two years was found off the north-west coast of Skye, where surface water was estimated to contain 28,566 microplastics per square kilometre.
The single biggest source of microplastic litter in 2021 and 2022 came from flakes of plastic-based paint.
Studies suggest microplastics are “highly detrimental” to the health of the wildlife that they come into contact with in the ocean. They can also transfer dangerous contamination up the food chain, with potentially serious consequences for human health.
Environmental campaigners described the quantities of microplastics in Scottish waters as “truly alarming” due to the “devastating” impact the litter has on “marine life, human health and climate change”.
The Scottish Government argued that “marine litter is a global challenge” and pointed out it had taken actions to ban some single-use plastics. It added that it is supporting efforts to “improve scientists’ understanding of the microplastic pollution problem”.
The data was released to The Ferret under freedom of information law. It is an update on figures published by Marine Scotland last year, which showed the results of microplastic sampling in Scottish surface waters between 2014 and 2020.
Of the 81 Scottish locations tested in 2021 and 2022, 64 contained microplastics. On average, the areas containing microplastics had an estimated 5000 items in them per square kilometre.
The figures provide a breakdown of the types of microplastic litter found. These include polystyrene, fragments and fibres from larger waste which has degraded, nurdles – small pellets which are the building blocks of all plastic production – and the paint flakes.
Some marine regions which showed high concentrations of microplastics between 2014 and 2020 were not surveyed in 2021 or 2022. This includes the two areas where the highest concentrations of microplastics have been found so far, Clyde and the Solway Firth.
A site in the Solway Firth south of Kirkcudbright – where there were an estimated 91,128 items per square kilometre in 2016 – had the highest concentration of microplastics found in Scottish waters.
High levels of microplastics have also previously been found in areas of the Firth of Forth and at Loch Long, near Helensburgh.
Each of Scotland’s 16 marine regions have now been tested since 2014, with microplastics found in areas of all of them.
Marine Scotland has attributed the high concentrations of microplastics in the Forth, Tay and Clyde regions to the fact that they are offshore of Scotland’s most densely populated and highly industrialised areas.
The Solway Firth is close to some major industry in England, which has been blamed for the high levels of microplastics off the south-west coast.
While the Marine Scotland survey looked specifically at surface waters, there is also evidence that microplastics are present in large numbers throughout Scotland’s seas.
According to researchers, microplastics are becoming “ubiquitous” in environments across the globe. They have been found in oceans, lakes, waterways, soil, air, food, and even the human bloodstream.
In March 2022, it was shown for the first time that microplastics from European rivers had made their way to the Arctic, with potentially damaging implications for the polar ecosystem.
The exact impacts of the widespread distribution of microplastic pollution are not currently known. But numerous studies have shown that microplastics have a significant impact on marine environments that they come into contact with.
When they are absorbed by animals through the food they eat, they can cause potentially fatal health problems. Other dangerous pollutants in water also gather on the surface of microplastics meaning that they can be passed up the food chain.
Some research has suggested that humans could be consuming more than 100,000 microplastic particles each year and there are concerns that some of the chemicals in the plastics could be harmful to our health.
Microplastics could also play a role in exacerbating the climate crisis by preventing the growth and reproduction of organisms like plankton.
Plankton and other microorganisms produce a huge amount of oxygen and also absorb carbon dioxide, stopping it from entering the atmosphere and causing global warming.
Dr David Santillo, a marine biologist at Greenpeace International, told The Ferret the Scottish figures
are further evidence that “microplastics are contaminating everything, everywhere”.
Santillo said: “It’s difficult to find much good news here, but the higher concentrations of microplastics found near population centres imply that a significant amount of the plastic in Scottish waters may have a Scottish origin.
“That means that efforts made in Scotland to reduce plastic waste can make a significant impact on the levels of plastic around the Scottish coast and in Scottish marine life.”
According to Allan Young, public affairs manager at the campaign group Open Seas, “you only need to walk along the high tide in Scotland to see the amount of waste on the shore”.
Young said: “The research we do beneath the surface frequently finds even more on the seabed.
“In 2015, the Scottish Government set out in their National Marine Plan the requirement that ‘properties and quantities of marine litter do not cause harm to the coastal and marine environment’, these figures suggest that plan is largely being ignored.
“There has been robust science done to understand the sources of microplastics – the Scottish Government must redouble its efforts to reduce and eventually stamp these out, as well to ensure that any residual amounts do not enter our waters.”
Kim Pratt, circular economy campaigner at Friends of the Earth Scotland, argued that to solve the problems caused by microplastics “we must reduce the amount of plastic that’s produced and used”.
“The level of microplastics found in our oceans is truly alarming. High concentrations, even in the most remote areas, suggest that plastic pollution is ubiquitous in our environment. This has a devastating effect on marine life, human health and climate change,” Pratt said.
“The INEOS petrochemical plant in Grangemouth is the third-largest plastic production facility in the world, so Scotland has an important role to play in making sure this happens.”
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “Marine litter is a global challenge, affecting the world’s oceans, seas, coastlines and shores.
“Our refreshed Marine Litter Strategy, to be published later this year, has an action plan to reduce sources of large litter, such as fishing gear, and micro, such as plastic pellets.
“Scotland has banned microbeads in rinse-off personal care products and was the first in the UK to ban plastic-stemmed cotton buds. We have also implemented a ban on many
single-use plastic products often found as beach litter and are introducing the UK’s first deposit return scheme next year.
“We will also continue to support developments in microplastic monitoring, improving scientists’ understanding of the microplastic pollution problem, and enabling more effective solutions that can be taken across the world to protect our environment.”
A spokesperson for INEOS’s Grangemouth plant pointed out that plastics had “positively” transformed the world and played an important role in lots of sectors.
They said: “As a major manufacturer of essential chemicals as well as plastics we take our responsibilities to the environment very seriously.
“Today, we are manufacturing a range of plastics that are replacing and displacing fossil-based raw materials, creating a circular economy where plastics can be used as a raw material for new plastics time and time again.”
<p><em>The Ferret is an editorially independent, not-for-profit co-operative run by its journalists and subscribers. You can find it at <a href="https://theferret.scot/">https://theferret.scot/</a> and can subscribe for £5 a month here: <a href="https://theferret.scot/subscribe/">https://theferret.scot/subscribe/</a></em></p>
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here